Thursday, 15 October 2026European Markets

TOTALENERGIES And ODFJELL TECHNOLOGY Have A High Dividend Yield And Return On Equity In The Energy Sector.

Loading stream...

(vianews) - totalenergies (tte.pa) is among this list of stock assets with the highest dividend rate and return on equity on the energy sector.

financial asset price forward dividend yield return on equity
totalenergies (tte.pa) €59.29 4.81% 16.66%
odfjell technology (otl.ol) kr63.60 4.6% 34.07%

several euronext companies pay out dividends to its shareholders. the dividend yield is a dividend to price ratio showing how much a company pays out in dividends each year.

1. totalenergies (tte.pa)

4.81% forward dividend yield and 16.66% return on equity

totalenergies se, a multi-energy company, produces and markets fuels, natural gas, and electricity in france, rest of europe, north america, africa, and internationally. it operates through integrated gas, renewables & power; exploration & production; refining & chemicals; and marketing & services segments. the integrated gas, renewables & power segment engages in integrated gas, including liquified natural gas (lng), and low carbon electricity businesses; and upstream and midstream lng activities. its exploration & production segment offers carbon storage and nature-based solutions. the refining & chemicals segment provides refining, petrochemicals, and specialty chemicals; and supply and trading of oil, and marine shipping services. its marketing & services segment engages in the supply and marketing of petroleum products. totalenergies se was formerly known as total se and changed its name to totalenergies se in june 2021. the company was founded in 1924 and is headquartered in courbevoie, france.

earnings per share

as for profitability, totalenergies has a trailing twelve months eps of €8.02.

pe ratio

totalenergies has a trailing twelve months price to earnings ratio of 7.39. meaning, the purchaser of the share is investing €7.39 for every euro of annual earnings.

return on equity

the company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is 16.66%.

revenue growth

year-on-year quarterly revenue growth declined by 16.2%, now sitting on 228.13b for the twelve trailing months.

more news about totalenergies.

2. odfjell technology (otl.ol)

4.6% forward dividend yield and 34.07% return on equity

odfjell technology ltd., a technology and engineering company, provides well, drilling, and engineering services in norway, europe, asia, the united kingdom, and internationally. the company operates through three segments: well services; operations; and projects & engineering. the well services segment provides casing and tubular running services, including automated and conventional; drilling tool and tubular rental services; and specialist well intervention products and services for exploration wells and for production. the operations segment engages in the production of drilling and well completion on client's rigs. this segment is also involved in the slot recovery, plug and abandonment, work-overs, and maintenance activities; and provision of platform drilling services on both fixed production platforms and on floating production platforms with subsea blowout preventers along with the management and performance of the services on leased jack-up rigs. the projects & engineering segment offers engineering and integrity services, including design and engineering to building supervision; and project management and operational support for units in operation, newbuild projects, and sps/rs recertification projects and yard stays. the company was founded in 1973 and is headquartered in aberdeen, the united kingdom.

earnings per share

as for profitability, odfjell technology has a trailing twelve months eps of kr7.92.

pe ratio

odfjell technology has a trailing twelve months price to earnings ratio of 8.03. meaning, the purchaser of the share is investing kr8.03 for every norwegian krone of annual earnings.

return on equity

the company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is 34.07%.

yearly top and bottom value

odfjell technology's stock is valued at kr63.60 at 16:30 est, above its 52-week high of kr62.90.

volatility

odfjell technology's last week, last month's, and last quarter's current intraday variation average was 4.14%, 0.38%, and 2.55%.

odfjell technology's highest amplitude of average volatility was 4.69% (last week), 2.93% (last month), and 2.55% (last quarter).

more news about odfjell technology.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Q4 2026 Biopharma Catalyst Cluster: Late-Stage Readouts and Regulatory Milestones
October 2026 brings a dense run of Phase 3 wins (ALOFT-IPF, RESTORE-3), new data presentations (Roche, Bayer, Lilly, Vertex, Galderma) and regulatory steps (FDA acceptance of Roche's vamikibart BLA, Scholar Rock's EMA resubmission). The next big catalyst is the ivonescimab FDA PDUFA date on 2026-11-14. Obesity combination studies (REDEFINE 4, TOGETHER-PsO) and the 2027 Maritime-1 completion point to more catalysts ahead. QAIAx's speculative AI-linked trial claims (the QIII pilot, targeted for 2027) are an unrelated micro-cap sideshow with weak evidence, and have little in common with the large-cap pipeline news.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,986
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,986 facts checked against source5,377 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com